• Skip to main content
  • Skip to site footer
img MENU MEMBERSHIP img
  • Home
  • Donate
  • Join
  • Login
img
  • About Us
    • Mission
    • History
    • Values
    • Advocacy
    • Partners
    • People
  • Get Involved
    • What You Can Do
    • State Chapters
    • Become a Member
    • Donate
  • Resources
    • Photo Gallery
    • Conferences
    • Courses
  • Latest News
    • 2023
    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
  • Blog
    • 2023
    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
  • Podcast
  • Contact Us
Australian Coastal Society

Australian Coastal Society

We are the voice of the Australian coast

ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES REMAIN THREATENED

August 29, 2020
Main Image

ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES REMAIN THREATENED

Main Image

Environmental legislation now before federal parliament offers an opportunity to go beyond that of removing “green tape”. Devolution to the states of federal responsibilities without an independent regulator and funding support will ensure our environmental trajectory remains unsustainable.

Just what is the great rush to change the Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (EPBC) Act in this session of Parliament?  Yes, there may be a case for “streamlining” the assessment process with a so-called “one-touch regime” as recommended in the interim review of this federal legislation by Graeme Samuel. But would this quick attempt at “green tape” removal really achieve the desired outcomes when so much needs to be done at national, state, and local levels to address the challenges facing on-going (and growing) threats to environmental conditions and values. One can only hope that the Senate will examine what the new bill contains and its potential consequences.

I chaired the second Australia State of Environment (SOE) Committee in 2001 soon after the EPBC Act 1999 came into effect. We closely followed the process set out in the first independent report (1996) which established procedures for 5-year reporting as required in the EPBC Act. Despite all the issues associated with having to analyse incomplete and often inconsistent data sets, we were confident enough to confirm patterns of degradation documented in SOE 1996.  Subsequent SOE reports provide further evidence of pressures on the environment, degrading conditions, and inadequate responses to meet the challenges facing the nation. In particular, our ability to measure trends in environmental asset condition and effectiveness of investment is questionable, as also noted in Auditor-General reports. Samuel made similar findings with his reference to the current environmental trajectory being “unsustainable”.

In the conclusion of SOE 2001 we wrote: “The Commonwealth Government is clearly in a key position to provide the necessary leadership to guide the nation further along the arduous path towards sustainability, but the states and territories, supported by local communities, are equally important…The key to Australia’s sustainable future lies in ourselves: our attitudes towards the environment, our heritage and each other. Positive change can be achieved when people see options for improvement in their quality of life and opportunities for their children and grandchildren. This change is accelerated when public awareness is translated into political action that influences the activities of our society to care for our country”.

That was 20 years ago! What has changed? Samuels tells us that our national legislation, the EPBC Act 1999, is “not fit to address current or future environmental challenges”. In the interim report he saw the need for changes to the Act and Minister Sussan Ley quickly agreed to some but not others. There was also a decision to continue the consultative process on a set of national standards related to Matters of National Environmental Significance (MNES) and establishing assurance responsibilities for compliance and enforcement of those standards at multiple scales.

I will focus on two decisions made by the Minister to date that unless modified in some way the nation will not adequately address the challenges highlighted by successive SOE reports and Samuels. Our environmental conditions will remain in an unsustainable state! Others have commented at length on these deficiencies. But given the legislation is now before Parliament it is critical to think further about what it will or will not achieve. My experience in working within state and federal administrations on environmental matters suggests that unless there are modifications those treasured values so fundamental to our national social, environmental, and economic well-being will be compromised.

I will assume that all the hard work by those involved in the development of MNES will result in an acceptable set of standards that will recognise the impact of climate change on threatened species and ecological communities. I will also assume that the Minister has ruled out an independent regulator contrary to the advice from Samuels, and that furthermore that bilateral agreements will be signed with the states. Both assumptions will require scrutiny both inside and outside of Parliament. However, I wish to focus on two associated components of proposed changes: one the assurance model and just how it works, and two, the Minister’s statement on funding to the states to exercise those national responsibilities and at what cost.

As pointed out by the Environmental Defenders Office and others, devolution of Commonwealth responsibilities under EPBC to the states may appear to be more efficient for certain types of developments, but effectiveness is doubtful unless there is a system of coordinated compliance and enforcement of national standards at multiple scales. As suggested by Samuels, there is a need for a “tough cop”. At a national level there are regulatory entities that examine compliance in banking, competition, tax but not for environment. Here an independent statutory body should be given sufficient powers to oversight adherence of MNES assuming the Australian Government is really serious about the protection of those matters! One is tempted to think they are seen more as obstacles to “jobs and growth” and not an essential component of our national well-being for which we have entered into international agreements to protect. There is precedent for federal law to include tough compliance provisions such as in Part 10 of the Water Act 2007, although some may ask how effective to date have been those provisions (see also Subdivision D on accrediting water resource plans prepared by Basin States). The EDO also has suggested consideration be given to the model of the Natural Resources Access Regulator as an independent statutory regulator. Unfortunately, there is not much information on just how the assurance process would work at this stage leaving open all sorts of speculation on how different state governments over time would seek to implement these “national” responsibilities; what is in it for them both politically and financially?

Minister Ley reported to the Sydney Morning Herald and The Age on 25 July that “we are not providing additional funding to the states”.  She said that the states would have to demonstrate they can meet and apply national standards without additional funding presumably indefinitely. Moreover they will be accountable “through a strong assurance and compliance process”. I have been around long enough to know that this is a furphy! Yes there are examples of federal funding for state-based environmental endeavours such as those associated with Great Barrier Reef management and in the Murray-Darling Basin for which there is clearly a defined shared responsibility.  

To ask states to take on this massive national task in a consistent way is a big ask without a “carrot”. Professor Paul Martin of UNE makes the point: “We have seen in Australia consistent under-resourcing of compliance and monitoring. The question now is whether the states have the capacity or backbone to properly oversee environmental management, and that depends on the integrity and resourcing of whichever agency has that responsibility”. There are models from overseas with which I am familiar such as under the US Coastal Zone Management Act 1972. Here a federal agency sets national guidelines and pays and monitors the states to implement those guidelines.

We may need to ask each Australian state and territory to amend their planning instruments in order to embed MNES within them (e.g. into State or Local strategic plans or even into Local Environmental Plans). This would make the MNES spatially explicit so that there would be certainty as to where threats to species and communities actually exist.  This would mean normal development assessment processes could proceed; however, the cost of putting all this in place and setting up processes of assessment and judicial review could be considerable. The outcome may be fairer, transparent, and meet the efficiency of a one stop process, but still the Commonwealth must ensure the states act consistently and thus are able to reach development assessment decisions in the national interest. Here a funding model could be developed that meets this test.

 Furthermore, the thorny issue of funding the management of sites that the Commonwealth has an international obligation to protect must also be considered. Here again we see an issue if say Ramsar or World Heritage site management is left to the whims of state budgets. Recent Victorian Auditor General review of Ramsar management has revealed serious deficiencies in this regard. If we are to seriously want our national government to address such issues then they need to have a “sustainable” funding mechanism to ensure that the financial and hence staffing burden of site management does not all fall on state agencies.

Going back to SOE 2001: political action was called for 20 years ago for the Commonwealth Government to provide leadership and help generate positive change to ensure a sustainable environmental future. Changes in 2020 to the EPBC Act should embrace this opportunity and demonstrate to our society that we do care for our country and matters of national environmental significance will be looked after by means beyond that of removing green tape. We cannot afford to waste another 20 years.

Bruce Thom

 

Words by Prof Bruce Thom. Please respect the author’s thoughts and reference appropriately: (c) ACS, 2020. For correspondence about this blog post please email austcoastsoc@gmail.com 

#170

By

Prof Bruce Thom |

Saturday, August 29, 2020 |

Category: Blog
Previous Post:Main ImageHAMELIN POOL (Shark Bay, Western Australia) —AN ESTUARY?
Next Post:Impact of sea-level rise on coastal natural values in TasmaniaMain Image

Sidebar

2023 (6)
  • Thursday, March 23 Federal Coastal Legislation – Public Trust Principles
  • Thursday, March 9 Public Trust Doctrine Part 1: Tribute to Jim Titus
  • Tuesday, February 28 Coastal Adaptation in Aotearoa New Zealand
  • Wednesday, February 15 US Coastal Barrier Resources Act: Model for Strategic Federal Intervention?
  • Tuesday, January 31 Philosophers and the Coast
  • Tuesday, January 17 Ocean Pools
2022 (24)
  • Thursday, December 22 Protecting Nature: Art of the Impossible?
  • Tuesday, December 13 Drainage Window Concept
  • Thursday, November 24 Cootamundra Shoals Survey 1982
  • Thursday, November 10 US Coastal Zone Management Act 1972: A Model for Australia?
  • Wednesday, October 26 Great Barrier Reef—More or Less Gloom
  • Wednesday, October 12 Bondi Pavilion Reopened and Rejuvenated
  • Wednesday, September 28 Coastal Journey Begins: September 1962
  • Monday, September 12 Protection For Sydney Harbour: Berrys Bay Case
  • Thursday, August 25 Coastal Inundation: A Hazard Not to be Underestimated
  • Tuesday, August 9 Beach Access – An International Perspective
  • Wednesday, July 27 SoE 2021 and Coasts
  • Tuesday, July 19 Human Rights and Beaches
  • Wednesday, July 6 Coastal Walks and Local Councils
  • Thursday, June 23 EPBC Act and Regional Landscape and Resilience Plans
  • Wednesday, June 15 29th NSW Coastal Conference
  • Thursday, May 19 Lament for Estuaries? (0)
  • Wednesday, April 27 East Coast Floods 2022 (0)
  • Monday, April 11 East Coast Weather ‘Traffic Jam’ (0)
  • Tuesday, March 29 VALE: PAUL BISHOP (0)
  • Thursday, March 24 IPCC Throws Down the Gauntlet on Australian Institutional Deficiencies
  • Friday, February 25 Recent federal coastal initiatives – February 2022
  • Tuesday, February 8 Resourceful ‘lucky’ country
  • Friday, January 28 FUTURE EARTH AUSTRALIA: SUSTAINABLE OCEANS AND COASTS NATIONAL STRATEGY 2021-2030
  • Monday, January 10 Sunflowers and hope
2021 (27)
  • Wednesday, December 22 DISCOVERING MORUYA 1971-2021
  • Sunday, December 12 PROTECTING A BIG CITY: NEW YORK DECISION MAKING
  • Wednesday, December 1 ICA REPORT: CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACT “ACTIONS OF THE SEA” AND FUTURE RISKS
  • Friday, November 12 NATIONAL CLIMATE RESILIENCE AND ADAPTATION STRATEGY (NCRAS)
  • Thursday, October 28 COASTAL FAMILY—THE ELIOTS
  • Sunday, October 10 COASTAL CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION: ROLES FOR THE AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT
  • Monday, September 27 Sydney Harbour: Impact of contamination studies
  • Friday, September 17 Geological indicators of seabed mobility – Narrabeen Beach (Sydney, Australia)
  • Monday, August 30 LAST INTERGLACIAL SEA LEVELS: RECENT RESEARCH AND MEET “STROMBUS BUBONIUS”
  • Wednesday, August 18   COASTAL NEWS – AUGUST 2021
  • Monday, July 19 Reflections on past coastal recommendations by the Australian Government
  • Monday, July 5 LARGS: A GEOHERITAGE SITE?
  • Thursday, June 24 PROPERTY RIGHTS: WHAT CONDITIONS PREVAIL IN A CIVIL SOCIETY?
  • Monday, June 14 UNIVERSITY RESEARCH—PERSONAL SADNESS
  • Saturday, May 29 SEAHORSE MONITORING BY WOOLLAHRA COUNCIL, NSW
  • Tuesday, May 18 US Climate Indicators
  • Saturday, May 8 AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT MARINE AND COAST INITIATIVES 2021
  • Sunday, April 25 Travelling west of the sandstone curtain – to Orange (NSW) and back
  • Tuesday, April 20 Big surf at Port Fairy (Victoria) – April 2021
  • Thursday, April 8 LAND: OWNERSHIP AND RIGHTS
  • Sunday, March 14 ESTUARY WETLANDS AND SEA-LEVEL RISE
  • Saturday, February 20 COASTAL ZONE AND CATCHMENT BOUNDARIES
  • Sunday, February 14 Coastal Archaeology Revisited
  • Saturday, January 30 JUDITH WRIGHT – POET, COASTAL CONSERVATIONIST AND MUCH MORE
  • Monday, January 18 COASTAL STORIES FROM THE FIELD,1970-2020
  • Monday, January 11 US COASTAL MANAGEMENT UNDER TRUMP
  • Monday, January 4 2020: A COASTAL PERSPECTIVE
2020 (26)
  • Wednesday, December 23 EPBC ACT CHANGES –WILL THEY BE WORTH THE EFFORT?
  • Monday, December 14 TWO JIMS—BOWLER AND COLEMAN
  • Thursday, November 26 AUSTRALIA UNDER THREAT—WHAT TO DO NEXT?
  • Saturday, November 7 SHORELINE RESPONSES TO SEA-LEVEL RISE
  • Sunday, October 25 Port Stephens-Myall Lakes 1960 – Research Opportunities
  • Wednesday, October 14 Port Stephens – Myall Lakes 1960 – the journey.
  • Monday, September 28 LEGACY ISSUES AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT
  • Friday, September 11 TYPHOONS AND HAINAN ISLAND, CHINA
  • Tuesday, September 1 Impact of sea-level rise on coastal natural values in Tasmania
  • Saturday, August 29 ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES REMAIN THREATENED
  • Thursday, August 6 HAMELIN POOL (Shark Bay, Western Australia) —AN ESTUARY?
  • Thursday, July 16 Estuary Health
  • Friday, July 3 UNIVERSITY RESEARCH AND TEACHING—THE NEXUS IS IT BROKEN?
  • Sunday, June 21 Sandy beach morphodynamics – a new book
  • Sunday, June 7 Cliffs in the Narrabeen Group, Sydney
  • Thursday, May 21 PROGNOSIS FOR A CHOKING MOUTH: THE RIVER MURRAY
  • Wednesday, May 6 Geomorphologic Mapping
  • Wednesday, April 22 DOVER HEIGHTS CLIFFS, SYDNEY
  • Sunday, April 12 Recent Coastal Legal Cases
  • Tuesday, March 24 CHALLENGE AND RESPONSE—THE CURRENT CRISIS
  • Wednesday, March 18 Recent papers in the journal Nature
  • Thursday, February 27 HOLOCENE SEA LEVELS AND COASTAL EVOLUTION
  • Monday, February 17 Brian Caton ‘a coastal legend’- RIP 9 February 2020
  • Tuesday, February 4 NATIONAL COASTAL ADAPTATION AGENDA 2010: A RETROSPECTIVE
  • Wednesday, January 22 TIME FOR ADAPTATION ACTION
  • Friday, January 10 EAST COAST FLOODS 2022 (0)
2019 (29)
  • Monday, December 30 Parsley Bay in the Summer
  • Monday, November 25 Australian Coastal Systems: A New Book from Andy Short
  • Tuesday, November 19 South Australian 2019 Coastal Conference and the ACS AGM
  • Wednesday, November 6 28th Annual NSW Coastal Conference – Terrigal, 2019
  • Sunday, October 27 Coastal Incidents
  • Tuesday, October 8 Coastal morphostratigraphy: two papers from Denmark
  • Friday, September 27 Climate Change Attribution
  • Tuesday, September 10 Vale Jack Davies at age 97 – leader, teacher and mentor
  • Wednesday, September 4 Coastal erosion and accretion beyond the historical timescale in NSW
  • Monday, August 19 Rethinking Landscape in Aotearoa
  • Friday, August 2 Collaborative Science and Coastal Adaptation
  • Saturday, July 20 CLIMATE CHANGE AND RELATIVITY – SOME PARALLELS
  • Sunday, July 14 DOUGLAS W. JOHNSON 1919 AND BEYOND
  • Tuesday, July 2 The Sandiford Line
  • Saturday, June 22 A Curiosity of Cusps
  • Monday, June 3 Federal Election 2019 and Coasts
  • Monday, May 13 Mangrove Generations
  • Sunday, May 5 John Sinclair of K’Gari (Fraser Island) 1939 – 2019
  • Monday, April 22 The Mighty Ord
  • Thursday, March 28 Climate change adaptation: perspectives from Canada and England
  • Monday, March 18 Foreshore land grants in eastern Sydney
  • Friday, March 15 The right to bath on the beach
  • Wednesday, March 6 Victorian Coastal Monitoring Program
  • Thursday, February 21 Future national need for a healthy environment
  • Wednesday, February 13 ANZGG CONFERENCE AT INVERLOCH, VICTORIA
  • Wednesday, February 6 Coastal science and the Murray River mouth
  • Saturday, February 2 INDIA COASTAL MANAGEMENT
  • Tuesday, January 15 Sydney Harbour Sea Fog – Summer of 2018/2019
  • Saturday, January 5 COASTAL RESILIENCE AND ADAPTATION
2018 (31)
  • Monday, December 17 CLIFF-TOP DUNES
  • Saturday, December 15 The whereabouts of climate change adaptation
  • Sunday, December 2 Observations from a long time marine debris collector.
  • Sunday, December 2 Backbarrier flats – a relic coastal landform
  • Monday, November 19 King Tides in Venice
  • Wednesday, November 14 27TH NSW COASTAL CONFERENCE 2018
  • Monday, November 12 Is the coast losing out with NRM? Proposed changes for South Australia
  • Saturday, November 3 Slicks (Part 2)
  • Tuesday, October 16 Twofold Bay – A Great Coastal Laboratory
  • Sunday, October 7 VALE: Professor John Chappell FAA (1940-2018)
  • Thursday, September 27 Coasts and Legal Systems
  • Sunday, September 16 Moods of Sydney Harbour
  • Sunday, August 26 Community Consultation
  • Saturday, August 18 Managing water quality through regenerative agriculture
  • Friday, August 3 Tomorrow’s Coasts – Complex and Impermanent
  • Thursday, July 12 Murray-Darling Basin Royal Commission
  • Monday, July 2 New South Wales Coastal Reforms – NSW Coastal Council’s first meeting
  • Tuesday, June 26 Victoria’s Coastal Reforms – ‘fit for purpose’ or an opportunity lost?
  • Wednesday, June 20 New SA Government promises improved coastal management
  • Thursday, June 14 OCCUPATION OF THE AUSTRALIAN CONTINENTAL SHELF
  • Wednesday, May 30 National Budgets – Some Thoughts
  • Wednesday, May 16 Guiding Principles for Marine and Coastal Management
  • Friday, May 4 Last Interglacial Marine Deposits at Mary Ann Bay, Tasmania
  • Sunday, April 29 Coast to Coast Hobart 2018
  • Thursday, April 5 Coastal Reforms in New South Wales – The Next Stage
  • Monday, March 26 Coastal Archaeology
  • Monday, March 12 Barrier Islands – An American Obsession?
  • Monday, February 26 Climate Change Adaptation in Australia – A Loss of Momentum
  • Thursday, February 15 Bruce Thom Blog – SUMMERAMA
  • Wednesday, January 31 King tides and extreme events
  • Sunday, January 14 Coastal Geomorphology 101
2017 (39)
  • Friday, December 29 Bruce Thom Blog – Speaking Truth to Power
  • Wednesday, December 20 National Surfing Reserves
  • Thursday, December 14 Beachrock
  • Saturday, December 9 Higher Tides
  • Monday, December 4 Keeping the Murray Mouth open
  • Monday, November 27 Victorian Coastal Management in 2017
  • Thursday, November 16 26th NSW Coastal Conference at Port Stephens
  • Thursday, October 26 Ancestral rivers and terraces
  • Monday, October 16 Murray Valley: a recent visit
  • Wednesday, October 11 The National Construction Code and coastal planning
  • Tuesday, September 19 Geomorphic evolution of Coorong, Lower Lakes and Murray Mouth
  • Wednesday, September 13 Queensland Coastal Conference 2017 – Ten years in the making
  • Tuesday, September 5 Hurricane Harvey and its implications
  • Friday, September 1 Gippsland (Victoria) and relative sea level rise
  • Sunday, August 27 US Office of Naval Research and the Australian Coast
  • Monday, August 21 Managing the unique wetlands of Gippsland Lakes
  • Thursday, August 10 Lifecycle of coastal environmental law
  • Friday, July 28 Charlie Veron – A Life Underwater
  • Sunday, July 23 Coastal Sediment Management
  • Friday, July 7 Coastal walks -Malabar Headland National Park, Sydney
  • Friday, June 30 Honeycomb Weathering
  • Friday, June 23 Disaster preparedness
  • Wednesday, May 31 Sept-Iles: Managing a migrating foreland
  • Wednesday, May 24 Achievements of the National Climate Change Adaptation Research Facility
  • Saturday, May 13 Coastal Shacks
  • Wednesday, April 26 Empress Augusta Bay, Bougainville
  • Thursday, April 20 The Blue Mud Bay case – Aboriginal property rights in the Northern Territory
  • Tuesday, April 4 Botany Bay Sands
  • Saturday, March 25 Wave Energy Resource
  • Wednesday, March 15 Clustering of Storms
  • Wednesday, March 15 Cape to Cape: A voyage around Botany Bay
  • Tuesday, March 7 The “Venice Effect”
  • Monday, February 27 Port Stephens Bioherms
  • Thursday, February 9 Coast Ambassadors
  • Friday, February 3 Coastal Graphics
  • Tuesday, January 31 Irukandji on the move
  • Tuesday, January 24 Acceleration in mean sea level
  • Wednesday, January 11 Concerns of an American coastal scientist under a Trump presidency
  • Sunday, January 8 EXTREME STORM EVENTS IN THE USA, AUGUST-SEPTEMBER 2021
  • About us
  • Get involved
  • News and events
  • Resources
  • Blog
  • Contact us

Banner Photography by Pixabay

© 2023 Australian Coastal Society. All Rights Reserved.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Mail
  • LinkedIn