• Skip to main content
  • Skip to site footer
img MENU MEMBERSHIP img
  • Home
  • Donate
  • Join
  • Login
img
  • About Us
    • Mission
    • History
    • Values
    • Advocacy
    • Partners
    • People
  • Get Involved
    • What You Can Do
    • State Chapters
    • Become a Member
    • Donate
  • Resources
    • Photo Gallery
    • Conferences
    • Courses
  • Latest News
    • 2023
    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
  • Blog
    • 2023
    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
  • Podcast
  • Contact Us
Australian Coastal Society

Australian Coastal Society

We are the voice of the Australian coast

Protecting Nature: Art of the Impossible?

December 22, 2022
Cute pup - Australian fur seal - Arctocephalus pusillus doriferus #marineexplorer by Flickr user John Turnbull. Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 2.0.

Protecting Nature: Art of the Impossible?

In recent weeks governments around the world, including ours, have been striving to reach agreement on “protecting nature”. The UN summit held in Montreal aimed at reaching a global deal to secure the protection of 30 per cent of the planet by 2030. This would involve investment in ways to achieve conservation of 30 per cent of both land area and ocean waters. By all accounts the process of reaching agreement on such targets was not without its difficulties; however, the important point is that all nations recognise the need to halt human-induced extinctions and to take deliberate steps to restore degraded land, inland waters, and coastal and marine ecosystems. Active participation in the summit by our Environment Minister, Tanya Plibersek, reinforced the intent of the Albanese Government to work in this direction.

Successive national State of Environment (SOE) reports have highlighted the continued degradation of much of Australia’s environmental assets. I was privileged to chair one of the early SOE reports (2001) and have observed with alarm conclusions of successive reports. Along with members of the Wentworth Group of Concerned Scientists advice has been offered on various ways biodiversity could be enhanced and our water resources managed in ways that support ecosystem health. We are part of a broader science and conservation fraternity that values nature and sees the need to go beyond existing public and private mechanisms to maintain and especially improve environmental health. The federal government’s recent response to the critical review of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (EPBC) Act 1999 by Graeme Samuel AC offers us a further opportunity to seek ways that will turn around negative trends of degradation.

In early December, Minister Plibersek released a response to the Samuel review and SOE report 2021. It was titled Nature Positive Plan: better for the environment, better for business.  The Minister highlighted in her opening statement that “The equation facing Australia is simple. If laws don’t change, our trajectory of environmental decline will not change either”. This is quite a bold and aspirational statement. But it also signifies that this federal government is determined to do something, and most commentators applaud it for that. We now enter a period of consultation on all aspects of this Nature Positive Plan, and what follows is an initial response to just one aspect, namely Regional Planning.

Regional planning fits within a broader reform agenda in the Plan defined by three principles: (1) deliver better laws that are “nature positive” (i.e. to ensure species and ecosystems are repaired and regenerating rather than being in decline); (2) find ways to speed up decision-making for business to do the right thing; and (3) restore integrity and trust to systems and environmental laws. Quite clearly there is a view that business is impeded at a national level under EPBC where “matters of national environmental significance” (MNES) are confronted by a development proposal. So, the question arises as to where these MNES are spatially distributed and how can they be assessed so that decision making is not prolonged. This becomes an issue of establishing appropriate standards so that MNES are readily identified, and that federal law is then known to apply. As stated in the Plan: “Implementation of standards at regional scale will provide flexibility and ensure critical habitat and other significant environmental matters are protected, including from cumulative impact”. To this end there will be a “Regional Planning Standard’ that will help guide negotiations with the states and territories and regional natural resource management (NRM) bodies and local government.

Many aspects of these federal government aspirations both excite and alarm me. As a geographer I am by nature attracted to the idea of applying a regional model. Spatial diversity of environmental resources dictates the need to address differences in their distribution and how forces driving changes to habitat condition will vary in space and over time. Climate change impacts operate at varying spatial and temporal scales. I assume that is why standards at regional level must embrace “flexibility”. It is also why cumulative impacts that may adversely impact on MNES require consideration. As an example, I turn to Gippsland Lakes in Victoria. Here we see wetlands to be protected under international agreement (Ramsar) being degraded by cumulative effects of changes in freshwater inflows and deepening of the entrance channel to the sea allowing lake waters to become more saline. If there was to be federal engagement in protecting (and repairing) these wetlands, then actions taken by state authorities that appear to facilitate that negative cumulative impact would require intervention under a new federal law.

I use this example to highlight that any effort by the federal government to introduce a three-level spatial zoning system would encounter complex inter-agency-NRM-local government governance arrangements that may prove incapable of resolving on-going degradation. The Nature Positive Plan identifies three zones: high protection, moderate protection, and development priority (see p.18-19). Applying them will take time (to 2028). Pilot examples will be used to locate each zone critical for development assessment of MNES and determining where it may be necessary to restore landscapes. Just what is the most effective way to secure “integrity and trust” in a system that will define these zones?

The Plan recognises the need to consult with NRM bodies. There are 54 such entities covering Australia. They have both links to state and federal governments. They have functioned in varying ways since formalised under Natural Heritage Trust arrangements in 2002. What they offer is a local environmental and economic perspective on the conditions facing landscape change particular to their region. Of importance is their link to local government and hence to state government land use planning provisions which can vary from state to state. They bring to the regional planning table under a new federal law a degree of knowledge that can easily be bypassed by state government agencies with broader (and siloed?) agendas. I fear that localism will be lost in any tradeoffs between state and federal governments without a clear articulation of the views of NRM bodies.

What I am proposing is that these existing NRM bodies be empowered and resourced as part of any pilot program of regional planning by being given first opportunity to define the three spatial levels using criteria as defined in the new “Regional Planning Standard”. I understand $29.3m is available to start regional planning. A good proportion of this should be made available to selected regions to trial a process which will apply MNES standards and zones at a regional scale. This could help facilitate a regional investment plan and enable measures of natural capital to be undertaken, such as through application of environmental accounts, to track changes to landscape and water conditions. By making the process transparent, community groups and others knowledgeable about regional conditions could take part in the process of regional planning under federal law. This would then be a prime input into negotiated agreements on what is practical in protecting and repairing nature in Australia.

Bruce Thom

Words by Prof Bruce Thom. Please respect the author’s thoughts and reference appropriately: (c) ACS, 2022. For correspondence about this blog post please email admin@australiancoastalsociety.org.au

#230

Category: BlogTag: ACS Blog, Bruce Thom Blog, UN Summit
Previous Post:Drainage Window Concept
Next Post:Ocean Pools

Sidebar

2022 (24)
  • Thursday, December 22 Protecting Nature: Art of the Impossible?
  • Tuesday, December 13 Drainage Window Concept
  • Thursday, November 24 Cootamundra Shoals Survey 1982
  • Thursday, November 10 US Coastal Zone Management Act 1972: A Model for Australia?
  • Wednesday, October 26 Great Barrier Reef—More or Less Gloom
  • Wednesday, October 12 Bondi Pavilion Reopened and Rejuvenated
  • Wednesday, September 28 Coastal Journey Begins: September 1962
  • Monday, September 12 Protection For Sydney Harbour: Berrys Bay Case
  • Thursday, August 25 Coastal Inundation: A Hazard Not to be Underestimated
  • Tuesday, August 9 Beach Access – An International Perspective
  • Wednesday, July 27 SoE 2021 and Coasts
  • Tuesday, July 19 Human Rights and Beaches
  • Wednesday, July 6 Coastal Walks and Local Councils
  • Thursday, June 23 EPBC Act and Regional Landscape and Resilience Plans
  • Wednesday, June 15 29th NSW Coastal Conference
  • Thursday, May 19 Lament for Estuaries? (0)
  • Wednesday, April 27 East Coast Floods 2022 (0)
  • Monday, April 11 East Coast Weather ‘Traffic Jam’ (0)
  • Tuesday, March 29 VALE: PAUL BISHOP (0)
  • Thursday, March 24 IPCC Throws Down the Gauntlet on Australian Institutional Deficiencies
  • Friday, February 25 Recent federal coastal initiatives – February 2022
  • Tuesday, February 8 Resourceful ‘lucky’ country
  • Friday, January 28 FUTURE EARTH AUSTRALIA: SUSTAINABLE OCEANS AND COASTS NATIONAL STRATEGY 2021-2030
  • Monday, January 10 Sunflowers and hope
2021 (27)
  • Wednesday, December 22 DISCOVERING MORUYA 1971-2021
  • Sunday, December 12 PROTECTING A BIG CITY: NEW YORK DECISION MAKING
  • Wednesday, December 1 ICA REPORT: CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACT “ACTIONS OF THE SEA” AND FUTURE RISKS
  • Friday, November 12 NATIONAL CLIMATE RESILIENCE AND ADAPTATION STRATEGY (NCRAS)
  • Thursday, October 28 COASTAL FAMILY—THE ELIOTS
  • Sunday, October 10 COASTAL CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION: ROLES FOR THE AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT
  • Monday, September 27 Sydney Harbour: Impact of contamination studies
  • Friday, September 17 Geological indicators of seabed mobility – Narrabeen Beach (Sydney, Australia)
  • Monday, August 30 LAST INTERGLACIAL SEA LEVELS: RECENT RESEARCH AND MEET “STROMBUS BUBONIUS”
  • Wednesday, August 18   COASTAL NEWS – AUGUST 2021
  • Monday, July 19 Reflections on past coastal recommendations by the Australian Government
  • Monday, July 5 LARGS: A GEOHERITAGE SITE?
  • Thursday, June 24 PROPERTY RIGHTS: WHAT CONDITIONS PREVAIL IN A CIVIL SOCIETY?
  • Monday, June 14 UNIVERSITY RESEARCH—PERSONAL SADNESS
  • Saturday, May 29 SEAHORSE MONITORING BY WOOLLAHRA COUNCIL, NSW
  • Tuesday, May 18 US Climate Indicators
  • Saturday, May 8 AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT MARINE AND COAST INITIATIVES 2021
  • Sunday, April 25 Travelling west of the sandstone curtain – to Orange (NSW) and back
  • Tuesday, April 20 Big surf at Port Fairy (Victoria) – April 2021
  • Thursday, April 8 LAND: OWNERSHIP AND RIGHTS
  • Sunday, March 14 ESTUARY WETLANDS AND SEA-LEVEL RISE
  • Saturday, February 20 COASTAL ZONE AND CATCHMENT BOUNDARIES
  • Sunday, February 14 Coastal Archaeology Revisited
  • Saturday, January 30 JUDITH WRIGHT – POET, COASTAL CONSERVATIONIST AND MUCH MORE
  • Monday, January 18 COASTAL STORIES FROM THE FIELD,1970-2020
  • Monday, January 11 US COASTAL MANAGEMENT UNDER TRUMP
  • Monday, January 4 2020: A COASTAL PERSPECTIVE
2020 (26)
  • Wednesday, December 23 EPBC ACT CHANGES –WILL THEY BE WORTH THE EFFORT?
  • Monday, December 14 TWO JIMS—BOWLER AND COLEMAN
  • Thursday, November 26 AUSTRALIA UNDER THREAT—WHAT TO DO NEXT?
  • Saturday, November 7 SHORELINE RESPONSES TO SEA-LEVEL RISE
  • Sunday, October 25 Port Stephens-Myall Lakes 1960 – Research Opportunities
  • Wednesday, October 14 Port Stephens – Myall Lakes 1960 – the journey.
  • Monday, September 28 LEGACY ISSUES AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT
  • Friday, September 11 TYPHOONS AND HAINAN ISLAND, CHINA
  • Tuesday, September 1 Impact of sea-level rise on coastal natural values in Tasmania
  • Saturday, August 29 ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES REMAIN THREATENED
  • Thursday, August 6 HAMELIN POOL (Shark Bay, Western Australia) —AN ESTUARY?
  • Thursday, July 16 Estuary Health
  • Friday, July 3 UNIVERSITY RESEARCH AND TEACHING—THE NEXUS IS IT BROKEN?
  • Sunday, June 21 Sandy beach morphodynamics – a new book
  • Sunday, June 7 Cliffs in the Narrabeen Group, Sydney
  • Thursday, May 21 PROGNOSIS FOR A CHOKING MOUTH: THE RIVER MURRAY
  • Wednesday, May 6 Geomorphologic Mapping
  • Wednesday, April 22 DOVER HEIGHTS CLIFFS, SYDNEY
  • Sunday, April 12 Recent Coastal Legal Cases
  • Tuesday, March 24 CHALLENGE AND RESPONSE—THE CURRENT CRISIS
  • Wednesday, March 18 Recent papers in the journal Nature
  • Thursday, February 27 HOLOCENE SEA LEVELS AND COASTAL EVOLUTION
  • Monday, February 17 Brian Caton ‘a coastal legend’- RIP 9 February 2020
  • Tuesday, February 4 NATIONAL COASTAL ADAPTATION AGENDA 2010: A RETROSPECTIVE
  • Wednesday, January 22 TIME FOR ADAPTATION ACTION
  • Friday, January 10 EAST COAST FLOODS 2022 (0)
2019 (29)
  • Monday, December 30 Parsley Bay in the Summer
  • Monday, November 25 Australian Coastal Systems: A New Book from Andy Short
  • Tuesday, November 19 South Australian 2019 Coastal Conference and the ACS AGM
  • Wednesday, November 6 28th Annual NSW Coastal Conference – Terrigal, 2019
  • Sunday, October 27 Coastal Incidents
  • Tuesday, October 8 Coastal morphostratigraphy: two papers from Denmark
  • Friday, September 27 Climate Change Attribution
  • Tuesday, September 10 Vale Jack Davies at age 97 – leader, teacher and mentor
  • Wednesday, September 4 Coastal erosion and accretion beyond the historical timescale in NSW
  • Monday, August 19 Rethinking Landscape in Aotearoa
  • Friday, August 2 Collaborative Science and Coastal Adaptation
  • Saturday, July 20 CLIMATE CHANGE AND RELATIVITY – SOME PARALLELS
  • Sunday, July 14 DOUGLAS W. JOHNSON 1919 AND BEYOND
  • Tuesday, July 2 The Sandiford Line
  • Saturday, June 22 A Curiosity of Cusps
  • Monday, June 3 Federal Election 2019 and Coasts
  • Monday, May 13 Mangrove Generations
  • Sunday, May 5 John Sinclair of K’Gari (Fraser Island) 1939 – 2019
  • Monday, April 22 The Mighty Ord
  • Thursday, March 28 Climate change adaptation: perspectives from Canada and England
  • Monday, March 18 Foreshore land grants in eastern Sydney
  • Friday, March 15 The right to bath on the beach
  • Wednesday, March 6 Victorian Coastal Monitoring Program
  • Thursday, February 21 Future national need for a healthy environment
  • Wednesday, February 13 ANZGG CONFERENCE AT INVERLOCH, VICTORIA
  • Wednesday, February 6 Coastal science and the Murray River mouth
  • Saturday, February 2 INDIA COASTAL MANAGEMENT
  • Tuesday, January 15 Sydney Harbour Sea Fog – Summer of 2018/2019
  • Saturday, January 5 COASTAL RESILIENCE AND ADAPTATION
2018 (31)
  • Monday, December 17 CLIFF-TOP DUNES
  • Saturday, December 15 The whereabouts of climate change adaptation
  • Sunday, December 2 Observations from a long time marine debris collector.
  • Sunday, December 2 Backbarrier flats – a relic coastal landform
  • Monday, November 19 King Tides in Venice
  • Wednesday, November 14 27TH NSW COASTAL CONFERENCE 2018
  • Monday, November 12 Is the coast losing out with NRM? Proposed changes for South Australia
  • Saturday, November 3 Slicks (Part 2)
  • Tuesday, October 16 Twofold Bay – A Great Coastal Laboratory
  • Sunday, October 7 VALE: Professor John Chappell FAA (1940-2018)
  • Thursday, September 27 Coasts and Legal Systems
  • Sunday, September 16 Moods of Sydney Harbour
  • Sunday, August 26 Community Consultation
  • Saturday, August 18 Managing water quality through regenerative agriculture
  • Friday, August 3 Tomorrow’s Coasts – Complex and Impermanent
  • Thursday, July 12 Murray-Darling Basin Royal Commission
  • Monday, July 2 New South Wales Coastal Reforms – NSW Coastal Council’s first meeting
  • Tuesday, June 26 Victoria’s Coastal Reforms – ‘fit for purpose’ or an opportunity lost?
  • Wednesday, June 20 New SA Government promises improved coastal management
  • Thursday, June 14 OCCUPATION OF THE AUSTRALIAN CONTINENTAL SHELF
  • Wednesday, May 30 National Budgets – Some Thoughts
  • Wednesday, May 16 Guiding Principles for Marine and Coastal Management
  • Friday, May 4 Last Interglacial Marine Deposits at Mary Ann Bay, Tasmania
  • Sunday, April 29 Coast to Coast Hobart 2018
  • Thursday, April 5 Coastal Reforms in New South Wales – The Next Stage
  • Monday, March 26 Coastal Archaeology
  • Monday, March 12 Barrier Islands – An American Obsession?
  • Monday, February 26 Climate Change Adaptation in Australia – A Loss of Momentum
  • Thursday, February 15 Bruce Thom Blog – SUMMERAMA
  • Wednesday, January 31 King tides and extreme events
  • Sunday, January 14 Coastal Geomorphology 101
2017 (39)
  • Friday, December 29 Bruce Thom Blog – Speaking Truth to Power
  • Wednesday, December 20 National Surfing Reserves
  • Thursday, December 14 Beachrock
  • Saturday, December 9 Higher Tides
  • Monday, December 4 Keeping the Murray Mouth open
  • Monday, November 27 Victorian Coastal Management in 2017
  • Thursday, November 16 26th NSW Coastal Conference at Port Stephens
  • Thursday, October 26 Ancestral rivers and terraces
  • Monday, October 16 Murray Valley: a recent visit
  • Wednesday, October 11 The National Construction Code and coastal planning
  • Tuesday, September 19 Geomorphic evolution of Coorong, Lower Lakes and Murray Mouth
  • Wednesday, September 13 Queensland Coastal Conference 2017 – Ten years in the making
  • Tuesday, September 5 Hurricane Harvey and its implications
  • Friday, September 1 Gippsland (Victoria) and relative sea level rise
  • Sunday, August 27 US Office of Naval Research and the Australian Coast
  • Monday, August 21 Managing the unique wetlands of Gippsland Lakes
  • Thursday, August 10 Lifecycle of coastal environmental law
  • Friday, July 28 Charlie Veron – A Life Underwater
  • Sunday, July 23 Coastal Sediment Management
  • Friday, July 7 Coastal walks -Malabar Headland National Park, Sydney
  • Friday, June 30 Honeycomb Weathering
  • Friday, June 23 Disaster preparedness
  • Wednesday, May 31 Sept-Iles: Managing a migrating foreland
  • Wednesday, May 24 Achievements of the National Climate Change Adaptation Research Facility
  • Saturday, May 13 Coastal Shacks
  • Wednesday, April 26 Empress Augusta Bay, Bougainville
  • Thursday, April 20 The Blue Mud Bay case – Aboriginal property rights in the Northern Territory
  • Tuesday, April 4 Botany Bay Sands
  • Saturday, March 25 Wave Energy Resource
  • Wednesday, March 15 Clustering of Storms
  • Wednesday, March 15 Cape to Cape: A voyage around Botany Bay
  • Tuesday, March 7 The “Venice Effect”
  • Monday, February 27 Port Stephens Bioherms
  • Thursday, February 9 Coast Ambassadors
  • Friday, February 3 Coastal Graphics
  • Tuesday, January 31 Irukandji on the move
  • Tuesday, January 24 Acceleration in mean sea level
  • Wednesday, January 11 Concerns of an American coastal scientist under a Trump presidency
  • Sunday, January 8 EXTREME STORM EVENTS IN THE USA, AUGUST-SEPTEMBER 2021
  • About us
  • Get involved
  • News and events
  • Resources
  • Blog
  • Contact us

Banner Photography by Pixabay

© 2023 Australian Coastal Society. All Rights Reserved.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Mail
  • LinkedIn