• Skip to main content
  • Skip to site footer
img MENU MEMBERSHIP img
  • Home
  • Donate
  • Join
  • Login
img
  • About Us
    • Mission
    • History
    • Values
    • Advocacy
    • Partners
    • People
  • Get Involved
    • What You Can Do
    • State Chapters
    • Become a Member
    • Donate
  • Resources
    • Photo Gallery
    • Conferences
    • Courses
  • Latest News
    • 2023
    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
  • Blog
    • 2023
    • 2022
    • 2021
    • 2020
    • 2019
    • 2018
  • Podcast
  • Contact Us
Australian Coastal Society

Australian Coastal Society

We are the voice of the Australian coast

Protection For Sydney Harbour: Berrys Bay Case

September 12, 2022
Berrys Bay by Flickr user Andrea S. Licensed under CC BY 2.0.

Protection For Sydney Harbour: Berrys Bay Case

A legal decision of great significance related to the protection of the natural heritage of Sydney Harbour has recently been made in a judgment by the Chief Judge of the NSW Land and Environment Court (Preston, CJ). The case involved a proposal to moor and use a floating dry dock in Berrys Bay located near the Harbour Bridge (Stannards Marine Pty Ltd v North Sydney Council 2002 NSW LEC 99 (8 August 2022)). His findings interest me from two perspectives; first in my current role as chair of a committee reviewing aspects of waterway health for Greater Sydney Harbour under the NSW Coastal Management Program (for details see Sydney Coastal Councils Group  website); and two, my general interest in the application of the Public Trust Doctrine (PTD) in coastal management.

The judgment makes explicit use of Chapter 10 of the Biodiversity and Conservation SEPP and the Foreshores and Waterways Area DCP that deals with Sydney Harbour. These planning instruments contain provisions giving legislative recognition to the concept of the public trust and the principle of intergenerational equity They are forms of delegated legislation, being made under the NSW Environment Planning and Assessment Act.

As stated by Preston: Chapter 10 of the B&C SEPP recognises “the catchment, foreshores, waterways and islands of Sydney Harbour” as the corpus of a public trust. The principal aim with respect to the Sydney Harbour Catchment recognises these natural elements of Sydney Harbour to be “an outstanding natural asset” (cl 10.1(1)(a)(i) and “a public asset of national and heritage significance” for existing and future generations (cl 10.1(1)(a)(ii)). The Foreshores and Waterways Area DCP gives effect to this principal aim (section 1.1). Chapter 10 of the B&C SEPP adopts the principles for the purpose of enabling the aims to be achieved in relation to the Foreshores and Waterways Area. These principles recognise Sydney Harbour as “a public resource, owned by the public, to be protected for the public good” (cl 10.1(2)(a)); “the public good has precedence over the private good whenever and whatever change is proposed for Sydney Harbour and its foreshores” (cl 10.1(2)(b)); and “protection of the natural assets of Sydney Harbour has precedence over all other interests” (cl 10.1(2)(c)). These aims and principles encapsulate the idea of public trusteeship of Sydney Harbour.

The Judge notes how the concept of the public trust has been invoked in cases concerning proposed activities in, or change of, natural harbours. He cites jurisprudence from the USA, Hong Kong and even cases from Sydney Harbour.  His summary of these cases is worth reading as it identifies the values attached to a natural harbour setting. For instance, he quotes Briscoe J of the NSW L&E Court in Addenbrooke Pty Ltd v Woollahra Municipal Council who recognised that “Sydney Harbour is one of the most beautiful harbours in the world. It provides pleasure not only to local residents and mariners but to many visitors from Australia and abroad”.

But what I really find meaningful is that Preston returned to the wording from what Tim Bonyhady and others consider to be one of Australia’s most important expositions of the PTD (see Thom, 2012, Macq. J. Int. and Comp. Envir.  Law, 21). This dealt with mining leases over foreshores from Mosman to Bradleys Head. They are worth repeating here (NSW Land Appeal Court in Re Sydney Harbour Collieries Co, 1895, 5 Land Appeal Court Reports 243). The judgment recognised the duty of the government, as trustee, to protect the public asset of Sydney Harbour:

“…It would be the duty of the Government not only to take the greatest care to protect both present and contingent public interest, but also to obtain the best consideration for the temporary alienation of frontages which, if the Crown would be in law a trustee, it holds in trust for the health, recreation, and enjoyment of an enormous and ever-increasing population”.

And going on with great foresight in 1895:

“In the next place, the rapid expansion of the metropolis on the south and north shores of the harbour, coupled with the fact that although the extension of the city landward is practically unlimited, the foreshores and waterways cannot be correspondingly extended, affords a very strong reason for refusing this lease. In the course of a generation, the population of Sydney and its suburbs will probably exceed 500,000, and in two generations some 700,000 or 800,000. That is a fact which would rather suggest the resumption of the foreshores than their alienation, unless in very exceptional circumstances when some imperious and paramount public purpose must be satisfied at any cost. But no consideration in the nature of rent could afford any compensation or consolation for the disfigurement of a harbour which we have all been taught to cherish as one of nature’s choicest masterpieces”.

Preston also links the concept of the public trust to the principle of intergenerational equity, one of the principles of “ecologically sustainable development” (or ESD; see s 6(2)(b) of the NSW Protection of the Environment Administration Act 1991(POEA Act)). He cites several legal scholars on the relationship between the concept of the PTD and the principle of intergenerational equity by saying that the public trust has been described as the strongest contemporary expression of the idea that the legal rights of nature and of future generations are enforceable against contemporary users. This leads him back to Chapter 10 of the Biodiversity and Conservation SEPP.

He argues that this SEPP recognises the need to afford intergenerational equity. In his words: “An essential aim is to ensure the catchment, foreshores, waterways and islands of Sydney Harbour are “protected, enhanced and maintained “not only as “an outstanding natural asset” but also as “a public asset of national and heritage significance”, “for existing and future generations” (cl 10.1(1)(a)(ii)). The language of this aim accords with the premise of intergenerational equity that the present generation is to ensure the health, diversity and productivity of the environment is maintained or enhanced for future generations…. As I have earlier explained, the identification of Sydney Harbour as a “public asset” with “national and heritage significance” recognises its status as a community asset available to be used and enjoyed by all the people of Australia but also that it is inherited as a legacy from previous generations and is to be transmitted from the existing generation to future generations. To protect, maintain and enhance Sydney Harbour as an outstanding natural asset and as a public asset of national and heritage significance is to implement each of the principles of conservation of options, conservation of quality and conservation of access for the benefit of future generations”.

This judgment comes at an opportune time. Preston has again given prominence to public rights as he did in his 2018 judgment at Belongil Beach in which I was involved (see Sack et al. 2020 EPLJ 37,128). In applying the concept of PTD and principle of intergenerational equity, the 2022 Berrys Bay case should contribute to future plans to maintain and improve the waterway health of our great Harbour and its catchment as defined in Chapter 10 of the B&C SEPP.

Bruce Thom 

Words by Prof Bruce Thom. Please respect the author’s thoughts and reference appropriately: (c) ACS, 2022. For correspondence about this blog post please email admin@australiancoastalsociety.org.au

#223

Category: BlogTag: ACS Blog, Berrys Bay, Bruce Thom Blog, Public Trust Doctrine, SEPP
Previous Post:Coastal Inundation: A Hazard Not to be Underestimated
Next Post:Coastal Journey Begins: September 1962

Sidebar

2022 (24)
  • Thursday, December 22 Protecting Nature: Art of the Impossible?
  • Tuesday, December 13 Drainage Window Concept
  • Thursday, November 24 Cootamundra Shoals Survey 1982
  • Thursday, November 10 US Coastal Zone Management Act 1972: A Model for Australia?
  • Wednesday, October 26 Great Barrier Reef—More or Less Gloom
  • Wednesday, October 12 Bondi Pavilion Reopened and Rejuvenated
  • Wednesday, September 28 Coastal Journey Begins: September 1962
  • Monday, September 12 Protection For Sydney Harbour: Berrys Bay Case
  • Thursday, August 25 Coastal Inundation: A Hazard Not to be Underestimated
  • Tuesday, August 9 Beach Access – An International Perspective
  • Wednesday, July 27 SoE 2021 and Coasts
  • Tuesday, July 19 Human Rights and Beaches
  • Wednesday, July 6 Coastal Walks and Local Councils
  • Thursday, June 23 EPBC Act and Regional Landscape and Resilience Plans
  • Wednesday, June 15 29th NSW Coastal Conference
  • Thursday, May 19 Lament for Estuaries? (0)
  • Wednesday, April 27 East Coast Floods 2022 (0)
  • Monday, April 11 East Coast Weather ‘Traffic Jam’ (0)
  • Tuesday, March 29 VALE: PAUL BISHOP (0)
  • Thursday, March 24 IPCC Throws Down the Gauntlet on Australian Institutional Deficiencies
  • Friday, February 25 Recent federal coastal initiatives – February 2022
  • Tuesday, February 8 Resourceful ‘lucky’ country
  • Friday, January 28 FUTURE EARTH AUSTRALIA: SUSTAINABLE OCEANS AND COASTS NATIONAL STRATEGY 2021-2030
  • Monday, January 10 Sunflowers and hope
2021 (27)
  • Wednesday, December 22 DISCOVERING MORUYA 1971-2021
  • Sunday, December 12 PROTECTING A BIG CITY: NEW YORK DECISION MAKING
  • Wednesday, December 1 ICA REPORT: CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACT “ACTIONS OF THE SEA” AND FUTURE RISKS
  • Friday, November 12 NATIONAL CLIMATE RESILIENCE AND ADAPTATION STRATEGY (NCRAS)
  • Thursday, October 28 COASTAL FAMILY—THE ELIOTS
  • Sunday, October 10 COASTAL CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION: ROLES FOR THE AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT
  • Monday, September 27 Sydney Harbour: Impact of contamination studies
  • Friday, September 17 Geological indicators of seabed mobility – Narrabeen Beach (Sydney, Australia)
  • Monday, August 30 LAST INTERGLACIAL SEA LEVELS: RECENT RESEARCH AND MEET “STROMBUS BUBONIUS”
  • Wednesday, August 18   COASTAL NEWS – AUGUST 2021
  • Monday, July 19 Reflections on past coastal recommendations by the Australian Government
  • Monday, July 5 LARGS: A GEOHERITAGE SITE?
  • Thursday, June 24 PROPERTY RIGHTS: WHAT CONDITIONS PREVAIL IN A CIVIL SOCIETY?
  • Monday, June 14 UNIVERSITY RESEARCH—PERSONAL SADNESS
  • Saturday, May 29 SEAHORSE MONITORING BY WOOLLAHRA COUNCIL, NSW
  • Tuesday, May 18 US Climate Indicators
  • Saturday, May 8 AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT MARINE AND COAST INITIATIVES 2021
  • Sunday, April 25 Travelling west of the sandstone curtain – to Orange (NSW) and back
  • Tuesday, April 20 Big surf at Port Fairy (Victoria) – April 2021
  • Thursday, April 8 LAND: OWNERSHIP AND RIGHTS
  • Sunday, March 14 ESTUARY WETLANDS AND SEA-LEVEL RISE
  • Saturday, February 20 COASTAL ZONE AND CATCHMENT BOUNDARIES
  • Sunday, February 14 Coastal Archaeology Revisited
  • Saturday, January 30 JUDITH WRIGHT – POET, COASTAL CONSERVATIONIST AND MUCH MORE
  • Monday, January 18 COASTAL STORIES FROM THE FIELD,1970-2020
  • Monday, January 11 US COASTAL MANAGEMENT UNDER TRUMP
  • Monday, January 4 2020: A COASTAL PERSPECTIVE
2020 (26)
  • Wednesday, December 23 EPBC ACT CHANGES –WILL THEY BE WORTH THE EFFORT?
  • Monday, December 14 TWO JIMS—BOWLER AND COLEMAN
  • Thursday, November 26 AUSTRALIA UNDER THREAT—WHAT TO DO NEXT?
  • Saturday, November 7 SHORELINE RESPONSES TO SEA-LEVEL RISE
  • Sunday, October 25 Port Stephens-Myall Lakes 1960 – Research Opportunities
  • Wednesday, October 14 Port Stephens – Myall Lakes 1960 – the journey.
  • Monday, September 28 LEGACY ISSUES AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT
  • Friday, September 11 TYPHOONS AND HAINAN ISLAND, CHINA
  • Tuesday, September 1 Impact of sea-level rise on coastal natural values in Tasmania
  • Saturday, August 29 ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES REMAIN THREATENED
  • Thursday, August 6 HAMELIN POOL (Shark Bay, Western Australia) —AN ESTUARY?
  • Thursday, July 16 Estuary Health
  • Friday, July 3 UNIVERSITY RESEARCH AND TEACHING—THE NEXUS IS IT BROKEN?
  • Sunday, June 21 Sandy beach morphodynamics – a new book
  • Sunday, June 7 Cliffs in the Narrabeen Group, Sydney
  • Thursday, May 21 PROGNOSIS FOR A CHOKING MOUTH: THE RIVER MURRAY
  • Wednesday, May 6 Geomorphologic Mapping
  • Wednesday, April 22 DOVER HEIGHTS CLIFFS, SYDNEY
  • Sunday, April 12 Recent Coastal Legal Cases
  • Tuesday, March 24 CHALLENGE AND RESPONSE—THE CURRENT CRISIS
  • Wednesday, March 18 Recent papers in the journal Nature
  • Thursday, February 27 HOLOCENE SEA LEVELS AND COASTAL EVOLUTION
  • Monday, February 17 Brian Caton ‘a coastal legend’- RIP 9 February 2020
  • Tuesday, February 4 NATIONAL COASTAL ADAPTATION AGENDA 2010: A RETROSPECTIVE
  • Wednesday, January 22 TIME FOR ADAPTATION ACTION
  • Friday, January 10 EAST COAST FLOODS 2022 (0)
2019 (29)
  • Monday, December 30 Parsley Bay in the Summer
  • Monday, November 25 Australian Coastal Systems: A New Book from Andy Short
  • Tuesday, November 19 South Australian 2019 Coastal Conference and the ACS AGM
  • Wednesday, November 6 28th Annual NSW Coastal Conference – Terrigal, 2019
  • Sunday, October 27 Coastal Incidents
  • Tuesday, October 8 Coastal morphostratigraphy: two papers from Denmark
  • Friday, September 27 Climate Change Attribution
  • Tuesday, September 10 Vale Jack Davies at age 97 – leader, teacher and mentor
  • Wednesday, September 4 Coastal erosion and accretion beyond the historical timescale in NSW
  • Monday, August 19 Rethinking Landscape in Aotearoa
  • Friday, August 2 Collaborative Science and Coastal Adaptation
  • Saturday, July 20 CLIMATE CHANGE AND RELATIVITY – SOME PARALLELS
  • Sunday, July 14 DOUGLAS W. JOHNSON 1919 AND BEYOND
  • Tuesday, July 2 The Sandiford Line
  • Saturday, June 22 A Curiosity of Cusps
  • Monday, June 3 Federal Election 2019 and Coasts
  • Monday, May 13 Mangrove Generations
  • Sunday, May 5 John Sinclair of K’Gari (Fraser Island) 1939 – 2019
  • Monday, April 22 The Mighty Ord
  • Thursday, March 28 Climate change adaptation: perspectives from Canada and England
  • Monday, March 18 Foreshore land grants in eastern Sydney
  • Friday, March 15 The right to bath on the beach
  • Wednesday, March 6 Victorian Coastal Monitoring Program
  • Thursday, February 21 Future national need for a healthy environment
  • Wednesday, February 13 ANZGG CONFERENCE AT INVERLOCH, VICTORIA
  • Wednesday, February 6 Coastal science and the Murray River mouth
  • Saturday, February 2 INDIA COASTAL MANAGEMENT
  • Tuesday, January 15 Sydney Harbour Sea Fog – Summer of 2018/2019
  • Saturday, January 5 COASTAL RESILIENCE AND ADAPTATION
2018 (31)
  • Monday, December 17 CLIFF-TOP DUNES
  • Saturday, December 15 The whereabouts of climate change adaptation
  • Sunday, December 2 Observations from a long time marine debris collector.
  • Sunday, December 2 Backbarrier flats – a relic coastal landform
  • Monday, November 19 King Tides in Venice
  • Wednesday, November 14 27TH NSW COASTAL CONFERENCE 2018
  • Monday, November 12 Is the coast losing out with NRM? Proposed changes for South Australia
  • Saturday, November 3 Slicks (Part 2)
  • Tuesday, October 16 Twofold Bay – A Great Coastal Laboratory
  • Sunday, October 7 VALE: Professor John Chappell FAA (1940-2018)
  • Thursday, September 27 Coasts and Legal Systems
  • Sunday, September 16 Moods of Sydney Harbour
  • Sunday, August 26 Community Consultation
  • Saturday, August 18 Managing water quality through regenerative agriculture
  • Friday, August 3 Tomorrow’s Coasts – Complex and Impermanent
  • Thursday, July 12 Murray-Darling Basin Royal Commission
  • Monday, July 2 New South Wales Coastal Reforms – NSW Coastal Council’s first meeting
  • Tuesday, June 26 Victoria’s Coastal Reforms – ‘fit for purpose’ or an opportunity lost?
  • Wednesday, June 20 New SA Government promises improved coastal management
  • Thursday, June 14 OCCUPATION OF THE AUSTRALIAN CONTINENTAL SHELF
  • Wednesday, May 30 National Budgets – Some Thoughts
  • Wednesday, May 16 Guiding Principles for Marine and Coastal Management
  • Friday, May 4 Last Interglacial Marine Deposits at Mary Ann Bay, Tasmania
  • Sunday, April 29 Coast to Coast Hobart 2018
  • Thursday, April 5 Coastal Reforms in New South Wales – The Next Stage
  • Monday, March 26 Coastal Archaeology
  • Monday, March 12 Barrier Islands – An American Obsession?
  • Monday, February 26 Climate Change Adaptation in Australia – A Loss of Momentum
  • Thursday, February 15 Bruce Thom Blog – SUMMERAMA
  • Wednesday, January 31 King tides and extreme events
  • Sunday, January 14 Coastal Geomorphology 101
2017 (39)
  • Friday, December 29 Bruce Thom Blog – Speaking Truth to Power
  • Wednesday, December 20 National Surfing Reserves
  • Thursday, December 14 Beachrock
  • Saturday, December 9 Higher Tides
  • Monday, December 4 Keeping the Murray Mouth open
  • Monday, November 27 Victorian Coastal Management in 2017
  • Thursday, November 16 26th NSW Coastal Conference at Port Stephens
  • Thursday, October 26 Ancestral rivers and terraces
  • Monday, October 16 Murray Valley: a recent visit
  • Wednesday, October 11 The National Construction Code and coastal planning
  • Tuesday, September 19 Geomorphic evolution of Coorong, Lower Lakes and Murray Mouth
  • Wednesday, September 13 Queensland Coastal Conference 2017 – Ten years in the making
  • Tuesday, September 5 Hurricane Harvey and its implications
  • Friday, September 1 Gippsland (Victoria) and relative sea level rise
  • Sunday, August 27 US Office of Naval Research and the Australian Coast
  • Monday, August 21 Managing the unique wetlands of Gippsland Lakes
  • Thursday, August 10 Lifecycle of coastal environmental law
  • Friday, July 28 Charlie Veron – A Life Underwater
  • Sunday, July 23 Coastal Sediment Management
  • Friday, July 7 Coastal walks -Malabar Headland National Park, Sydney
  • Friday, June 30 Honeycomb Weathering
  • Friday, June 23 Disaster preparedness
  • Wednesday, May 31 Sept-Iles: Managing a migrating foreland
  • Wednesday, May 24 Achievements of the National Climate Change Adaptation Research Facility
  • Saturday, May 13 Coastal Shacks
  • Wednesday, April 26 Empress Augusta Bay, Bougainville
  • Thursday, April 20 The Blue Mud Bay case – Aboriginal property rights in the Northern Territory
  • Tuesday, April 4 Botany Bay Sands
  • Saturday, March 25 Wave Energy Resource
  • Wednesday, March 15 Clustering of Storms
  • Wednesday, March 15 Cape to Cape: A voyage around Botany Bay
  • Tuesday, March 7 The “Venice Effect”
  • Monday, February 27 Port Stephens Bioherms
  • Thursday, February 9 Coast Ambassadors
  • Friday, February 3 Coastal Graphics
  • Tuesday, January 31 Irukandji on the move
  • Tuesday, January 24 Acceleration in mean sea level
  • Wednesday, January 11 Concerns of an American coastal scientist under a Trump presidency
  • Sunday, January 8 EXTREME STORM EVENTS IN THE USA, AUGUST-SEPTEMBER 2021
  • About us
  • Get involved
  • News and events
  • Resources
  • Blog
  • Contact us

Banner Photography by Pixabay

© 2023 Australian Coastal Society. All Rights Reserved.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Mail
  • LinkedIn